Saturday, May 24, 2014
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Monday, January 6, 2014
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Friday, December 6, 2013
Words can be invented & used to obfuscate reality & intention & to scare & terrorize people into conformity & compliance. Would you be surprised if I said that I'd be all for government IF all "taxes" were optional, all programs became services & products, & IF we were given the freedom to choose what government programs we wanted to pay for without fear of coercion, threats of violence, jail, or murder? If taxes & government services were optional, government would be called a business, & taxes would be called a bill for those services. While they are not optional, "taxation" is actually theft, "government" is actually organized crime, & their "services" are actually intrusions & monopolies. While there is government in its current form, or any corporation or mob using force, fraud & coercion, there is actually no freedom & this is actually not a free market. The free market, which is just me freely & willingly trading with you or anyone else I want to, has been demonized by mislabeling our current situation. If government is involved at all, taxes anything, subsidizes anything, or forces anybody to use their currency that they keep inflating, it is not a free & fair trade that is responding to natural supply & demand.
Maybe I would vote if all taxes would become optional. But that's not going to happen so I'm not going to waste my time pretending that I can influence anything to become better by voting. But since the word anarchy has become demonized to scare the public into believing that it equates to chaos, now we have chaos. Anarchy means without rulers. If you don't want anarchy, then you want threats to coerce your money out of you, and you want violence initiated against your neighbors for not paying off our masters.
So to appease everyone's anxiety we've developed over the thought of having no coercive slave masters, it might be easier for people to imagine optional taxes & services rather than no government. Until people start using words correctly & recognizing the actions of evil people for what they actually are, I'll start describing our solution this way, but it really is the same thing.
No politician will ever be elected who will want to put a stop to government theft & coercion, but let's pretend like that did happen & the government did make all services optional. Maybe the infrastructure would be useful to maintain order, peace, and prosperity. It would be much more than sufficient. If government became a profit driven business that didn't use coercion to gets its revenues & income, it would actually have to slim down, cut unnecessary jobs & budgets (putting most government worker parasites out of work), become more efficient & streamlined. If we saw or heard about anything the government was doing that we didn't approve of, we could actually make a difference by boycotting it & their services. Because of that, if all of government was voluntary, they would actually have to work out all their problems, inefficiencies, & evils. Only a vote with our dollars or resources to trade is a vote that actually counts. We'd actually have a say. Since we don't like war, wars would be over. Since we don't like incarcerating peaceful people, that would stop. Since some of us want to help the poor, handouts would stop. We'd stop the practice of indoctrinating children for 15000 hours that coercion was a virtue, that they could only aspire to be workers & job seekers, & to love their masters & their servitude. EVERYTHING wrong would be made right. The markets would become truly free, & much more equality would come about, because we wouldn't approve of protecting corporations from their liabilities, & bailing them out when their gambles failed. Government would become responsible & liable for any evils it perpetuates, hurting its own business. Government IS ACTUALLY a business right now, but one that is allowed to use coercion & violence to get its revenues, giving it a monopoly or else an unfair advantage in any industry it decides to get involved in, raising prices for everybody, & the debt for our unborn generations. If we made our moral standards apply to EVERYONE, without a government exemption, ALL OF THE WORLDS EVILS & INEFFICIENCIES WOULD EVOLVE THEMSELVES OUT OF EXISTENCE. If government were just another peaceful and optional business, then there would be nothing called "government." We would be our own rulers, & there would be anarchy, which would result in real order & peace.
All government programs people would WANT to pay for would still be provided. So there'd be optional services for roads, police, & security/protection, as long as there is demand for that product. The entire existing system can be beneficial for us ONLY if it is voluntary & optional in its nature. If you want me to move because I don't like coercion, YOU ARE THE ONE WHO WANTS VIOLENCE DONE AGAINST ME & MY PROPERTY STOLEN FROM ME. YOU HAVE BECOME AN ADVOCATE OF VIOLENCE & MURDER, & YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CAN MOVE. Now that you have this knowledge & an understanding of these higher moral standards, you have to evolve past what you've always thought & your state worship. Now that you have heard that taxation is theft, you either accept that definition, or you are compliant with evil.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Thought provoked by the question at minute 30 of the podcast I'm listening to right now. "But who will make the roads & freeways?" What is a big reason local community & culture is dying & local mom & pop shops are all going under? Because we can drive through all that to get to a bigger chain store or a bigger event. If no consumers want roads after a government, or if no company can figure out how to provide them, then let them deteriorate back into the earth. We would be forced to actually get involved locally, to have local culture, events, shops, & activities. Entrepreneurs would be able to make their own business's succeed & we'd be enriching our neighbors and our communities instead of Wall Street. Fuck the roads! freedomain radio 2211 mp3 Listening to Freedomain Radio! Volume 6: Shows 2120+ FDR2381 They Are Coming for Us #iCatcher! http://www.freedomainradio.com/
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
What do people say is the final point & purpose of government forcing children to go to one type of school or another until they are an adult, & all the wile encouraging them to go to a good college or university? "To get a good job," is the common answer. To be able to take one more job off the market for yourself, & to take that opportunity away from someone else, therefore increasing scarcity for everyone who doesn't have a job, by one. You are always told that the point of all of that is to GET a job. The idea, education, & know how of how to CREATE a business is not even in the periphery of the common student or graduate. Free market capitalism works when there is no mass child coercion & retardation. The 1500 hours of forced government schooling is to create a culture of INSTITUTIONALIZED DEPENDENCY. It forces the mass of the population to be dependent on someone else to have any kind of income, livelihood, & security. Rather than making those things happen for themselves, they are at the mercy of employers & those who were actually able to develop their interests into a profitable business. A job is basically a hand out compared to being able to CREATE jobs. Jobs will never "come back" to the economy until more people start creating jobs. If the government owns lots of shares of the corporations who are outsourcing their jobs abroad (CAFR) then they have a profit incentive & would prefer to outsource those jobs rather then keep them here. If they are positioned to make more money one way or another from corporations being more profitable than from a well employed citizen tax base, they will take option A, furthering the INSTITUTIONALIZATION of DEPENDENCY through the well fair state. It's all about what gives them more bang for their buck, not providing us with jobs or the ability to make businesses & become employers. It's more profitable for them & their holdings to minimize the amount of corporate competition as much as possible, so that the companies they have some ownership in can price gouge as much as possible. If we want more jobs here, we have to create them instead of just taking them.